|
Previous article
Next article |
|
ARTICLE
Year : 2021 | Volume
: 19
| Issue : 4 | Page : 259-270
Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon
Michael S Esbach1, Flora Lu2, Felipe Borman Quenama3
1 High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, New Jersey; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Florida, USA 2 Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA 3 Cofán Zábalo, Sucumbíos, Ecuador
Correspondence Address: Michael S Esbach High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, New Jersey; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Florida USA
 Source of Support: MSE was supported by the University of Florida’s Tropical Conservation and Development (TCD) programme and the School of Natural Resources and Environment (SNRE). FL’s longitudinal research in the Ecuadorian Amazon has been supported by the National Science Foundation (BCS-0822967, BCS-1258852) and the National Institutes of Health (R01-HD38777-01). Any errors or misinterpretations are solely the responsibility of the authors., Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests in the conduct of this research.  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_20_137

Date of Submission | 01-Aug-2020 |
Date of Acceptance | 12-Jul-2021 |
Date of Web Publication | 29-Oct-2021 |
|
|

Abstract | | |
Accelerating deforestation and ecological degradation, linked to political and economic policies and agendas that endanger the health, well-being, and cultural survival of Indigenous people, present dire threats to the Amazonian biome and its inhabitants. Confronting these challenges necessitates a unified response by local and global partners. However, some conservationists, predominantly from the Global North, have perpetuated problematic, essentialised framings of Indigenous communities, which have even led them to advocate for punitive protectionist policies that we argue are morally and conceptually flawed. Western scientific and popular discourse often presents nature conservation via protected areas as a universal good. In this article, we argue for a more pluralistic approach; one that calls for an equitable footing between Indigenous knowledge and sustainability science. We examine a case study of the Cofán community of Zábalo in the Ecuadorian Amazon, where collective efforts to tsampima coiraye (care for the forest) have resulted in dynamic institutions adapted to diverse challenges and opportunities. Tsampima coiraye exemplifies a form of caretaking that is distinct from and complementary to Western conservation, one that provides important insights into understanding the context and meanings through which community governance fosters stewardship. We draw upon longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork and the Cofán concept of puifama atesuye (Two-World Knowledge) to describe collective action, community governance, and caretaking.
Keywords: Amazon, care, conservation, Cofán, Ecuador, indigenous people
How to cite this article: Esbach MS, Lu F, Quenama FB. Conservation and Care among the Cofán in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Conservat Soc 2021;19:259-70 |
Abstract and title in Cofán and Spanish: https://bit.ly/3zE16X6


|